Interfearence could be partial overcome by using many, many different bands so that traffic could be spread out over 20-50 different frequencies or so. However, if you stratigicly placed routers/repeaters over a country, you might be able to give that entire country a wireless computer network, just don't do peer-to-peer filesharing or other high bandwidth tasks on it please. Your maximum range is about 10% beyond the horizon. The problem with these bands is they do not skip the way the SW bands do so cannot cross long distances. (WiFi btw is basicly just what we're already talking about on the microwave bands) then a lot more spectrum opens up. However, if you use the UHF, VHF, and microwave bands. 100hz to 30mhz, Connects to PC Serial Port, Windows 3. 550: Pegasus DSP Tranceiver, 160-10m, 100 watts, CW, SSB, FM, AM (receive only). As I personaly think being to communicate world events to third world contries is more important than giving a single third world contriy e-mail. Click on the small picture for a larger one (if available) Click on the Model Number for a SPEC sheet. However this would tie up so much of the available radio spectrum that most other SW would be unable to function. Yes, it would be possible to reallocate the frequency plans so that a few, high-bandwidth (for this I'm only saying a couple of Mbps) internet routers would exist. For the sake of this post I'll consider SW to include the 6 Meter HAM band (about 50 MHz) and lower.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |